The humanization of criminal law in the modern state of law was advanced most clearly by mitigating the sanction, which it was necessary to take special care not to put the specific preventive effectiveness of criminal risk. In this regard, in my opinion, the Probation Service in this country only done his good contribution. However, the probation unit in view of the boundless differentiation of Maßregelrechts in the sign of punitivorientierten Criminal Policy in an increased role conflict, which she holds in her role understanding anyway. As practitioners in the district well known probation is hopelessly overloaded because of the challenging tasks of the previously permanently expanded electronic surveillance, so that their roles threatens to degenerate in favor of the control task. This problem represents a tip of the iceberg, which has to put the Korean sanctions or sentencing guidelines for constitutional reform. The reform attempts in 1992 and 2011 were indeed rudimentary stood in a right direction to an ordered two-lane system of sanctions. However, they were always half-hearted attempts, because lacking a common thread to the humanization of criminal law. The present contribution is to mark the 25th anniversary of the Korean Probation an attempt to critical reflection on the meaning and justification of the measure or the probation service, which would be to draw in their reorganization or reform to rate.