This study attempted to examine the similarities and differences of LSRP according to culture by conducting a study on the validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy scale based on the cross-cultural point of view. To this end, data on the general public and inmates in two countries, Korea and the United States, were used. Through measurement equivalence, we explored whether LSRP can be commonly used as a psychopathic measurement tool. In addition, the difference between the sub-factors appearing in Korea and the United States was confirmed through the latent mean analysis, and the difference according to the items was confirmed through the analysis of the differential function items. As a result, configural invariance and partial metric invariance were established in the general public group, and configural invariance and partial metric invariance were established in the inmates group. As a result of the latent mean analysis, it was found that the factors of egocentricity and callousness were significantly higher in Korea regardless of the group of samples. However, the antisocial factor was found to be significantly lower in Korea. As a result of searching for differential functional items, it was found that some of the items of egocentricity and antisocial were differential functional items, but there were no differential functional items in the callousness factor. This study is of great significance as the first study in Korea to verify the measurement equivalence of LSRP by validating LSRP through cross-cultural point of view.